▼ |  | Scribble as Preprocessor

1 | Text Generation
2 | HTML Generation
| Index

► | 1 | Text Generation

1.1 | Writing Text Files
1.2 | Defining Functions and More
1.3 | Using Printouts
1.4 | Indentation in Preprocessed output
1.5 | Using External Files
1.6 | Text Generation Functions

On this page:

1.1`` Writing Text Files
1.2`` Defining Functions and More
1.3`` Using Printouts
1.4`` Indentation in Preprocessed output
1.5`` Using External Files
1.6`` Text Generation Functions
outputable/ c
output
block
splice
disable-prefix
restore-prefix
add-prefix
set-prefix
flush
with-writer
add-newlines
split-lines
include/ text
begin/ text

top ← prev up next →

### 1`` Text Generation

#lang scribble/text | package: scribble-text-lib

The scribble/text language provides everything from racket/base, racket/promise, racket/list, and racket/string, but with additions and a changed treatment of the module top level to make it suitable as for text generation or a preprocessor language:

- The language uses read-syntax-inside to read the body of the module, similar to Document Reader. This means that by default, all text is read in as Racket strings; and @-forms can be used to use Racket functions and expression escapes.

- Values of expressions are printed with a custom output function. This function displays most values in a similar way to display, except that it is more convenient for a textual output.

When scribble/text is used via require instead of #lang, then it does not change the printing of values, it does not include the bindings of racket/base, include is provided as include/text, and begin is provided as begin/text.

#### 1.1`` Writing Text Files

The combination of the two features makes text in files in the scribble/text language be read as strings, which get printed out when the module is required, for example, when a file is given as an argument to racket. (In these example the left part shows the source input, and the right part the printed result.)

> #lang scribble/text
> Programming languages should
> be designed not by piling
> feature on top of feature, but
> blah blah blah.
> | → |
> Programming languages should
> be designed not by piling
> feature on top of feature, but
> blah blah blah.

Using @-forms, we can define and use Racket functions.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(require racket/list)
> @(define Foo "Preprocessing")
> @(define (3x . x)
> ;; racket syntax here
> (add-between (list x x x) " "))
> @Foo languages should
> be designed not by piling
> feature on top of feature, but
> @3x{blah}.
> | → |
> Preprocessing languages should
> be designed not by piling
> feature on top of feature, but
> blah blah blah.

As demonstrated in this case, the output function simply scans nested list structures recursively, which makes them convenient for function results. In addition, output prints most values similarly to display — notable exceptions are void and false values which cause no output to appear. This can be used for convenient conditional output.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (errors n)
> (list n
> " error"
> (and (not (= n 1)) "s")))
> You have @errors[3] in your code,
> I fixed @errors[1].
> | → |
> You have 3 errors in your code,
> I fixed 1 error.

Using the scribble @-forms syntax, you can write functions more conveniently too.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (errors n)
> ;; note the use of `unless'
> @list{@n error@unless[(= n 1)]{s}})
> You have @errors[3] in your code,
> I fixed @errors[1].
> | → |
> You have 3 errors in your code,
> I fixed 1 error.

Following the details of the scribble reader, you may notice that in these examples there are newline strings after each definition, yet they do not show in the output. To make it easier to write definitions, newlines after definitions and indentation spaces before them are ignored.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (plural n)
> (unless (= n 1) "s"))
> @(define (errors n)
> @list{@n error@plural[n]})
> You have @errors[3] in your code,
> @(define fixed 1)
> I fixed @errors[fixed].
> | → |
> You have 3 errors in your code,
> I fixed 1 error.

These end-of-line newline strings are not ignored when they follow other kinds of expressions, which may lead to redundant empty lines in the output.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n str)
> (for/list ([i (in-range 1 (add1 n))])
> @list{@i @str,@"\n"}))
> Start...
> @count[3]{Mississippi}
> ... and I'm done.
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi,
> ... and I'm done.

There are several ways to avoid having such empty lines in your output. The simplest way is to arrange for the function call’s form to end right before the next line begins, but this is often not too convenient. An alternative is to use a @; comment, which makes the scribble reader ignore everything that follows it up to and including the newline. (These methods can be applied to the line that precedes the function call too, but the results are likely to have what looks like erroneous indentation. More about this below.)

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n str)
> (for/list ([i (in-range 1 (+ n 1))])
> @list{@i @str,@"\n"}))
> Start...
> @count[3]{Mississippi
> }... done once.
> Start again...
> @count[3]{Massachusetts}@;
> ... and I'm done again.
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi,
> ... done once.
> Start again...
> 1 Massachusetts,
> 2 Massachusetts,
> 3 Massachusetts,
> ... and I'm done again.

A better approach is to generate newlines only when needed.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(require racket/list)
> @(define (counts n str)
> (add-between
> (for/list ([i (in-range 1 (+ n 1))])
> @list{@i @str,})
> "\n"))
> Start...
> @counts[3]{Mississippi}
> ... and I'm done.
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi,
> ... and I'm done.

In fact, this is common enough that the scribble/text language provides a convenient facility: add-newlines is a function that is similar to add-between using a newline string as the default separator, except that false and void values are filtered out before doing so.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n str)
> (add-newlines
> (for/list ([i (in-range 1 (+ n 1))])
> @list{@i @str,})))
> Start...
> @count[3]{Mississippi}
> ... and I'm done.
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi,
> ... and I'm done.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n str)
> (add-newlines
> (for/list ([i (in-range 1 (+ n 1))])
> @(and (even? i) @list{@i @str,}))))
> Start...
> @count[6]{Mississippi}
> ... and I'm done.
> | → |
> Start...
> 2 Mississippi,
> 4 Mississippi,
> 6 Mississippi,
> ... and I'm done.

The separator can be set to any value.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n str)
> (add-newlines #:sep ",\n"
> (for/list ([i (in-range 1 (+ n 1))])
> @list{@i @str})))
> Start...
> @count[3]{Mississippi}.
> ... and I'm done.
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi.
> ... and I'm done.

#### 1.2`` Defining Functions and More

(Note: most of the tips in this section are applicable to any code that uses the Scribble @-forms syntax.)

Because the Scribble reader is uniform, you can use it in place of any expression where it is more convenient. (By convention, we use a plain S-expression syntax when we want a Racket expression escape, and an @-forms for expressions that render as text, which, in the scribble/text language, is any value-producing expression.) For example, you can use an @-forms for a function that you define.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define @bold[text] @list{*@|text|*})
> An @bold{important} note.
> | → |
> An *important* note.

This is not commonly done, since most functions that operate with text will need to accept a variable number of arguments. In fact, this leads to a common problem: what if we want to write a function that consumes a number of “text arguments” rathen than a single “rest-like” body? The common solution for this is to provide the separate text arguments in the S-expression part of an @-forms.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (choose 1st 2nd)
> @list{Either @1st, or @|2nd|@"."})
> @(define who "us")
> @choose[@list{you're with @who}
> @list{against @who}]
> | → |
> Either you're with us, or against us.

You can even use @-formss with a Racket quote or quasiquote as the “head” part to make it shorter, or use a macro to get grouping of sub-parts without dealing with quotes.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (choose 1st 2nd)
> @list{Either @1st, or @|2nd|@"."})
> @(define who "us")
> @choose[@list{you're with @who}
> @list{against @who}]
> @(define-syntax-rule (compare (x ...) ...)
> (add-newlines
> (list (list "* " x ...) ...)))
> Shopping list:
> @compare[@{apples}
> @{oranges}
> @{@(* 2 3) bananas}]
> | → |
> Either you're with us, or against us.
> Shopping list:
> * apples
> * oranges
> * 6 bananas

Yet another solution is to look at the text values and split the input arguments based on a specific token. Using match can make it convenient — you can even specify the patterns with @-formss.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(require racket/match)
> @(define (features . text)
> (match text
> [@list{@|1st|@...
> ---
> @|2nd|@...}
> @list{>> Pros <<
> @1st;
> >> Cons <<
> @|2nd|.}]))
> @features{fast,
> reliable
> ---
> expensive,
> ugly}
> | → |
> >> Pros <<
> fast,
> reliable;
> >> Cons <<
> expensive,
> ugly.

In particular, it is often convenient to split the input by lines, identified by delimiting "\n" strings. Since this can be useful, a split-lines function is provided.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(require racket/list)
> @(define (features . text)
> (add-between (split-lines text)
> ", "))
> @features{red
> fast
> reliable}.
> | → |
> red, fast, reliable.

Finally, the Scribble reader accepts any expression as the head part of an @-form — even an @ form. This makes it possible to get a number of text bodies by defining a curried function, where each step accepts any number of arguments. This, however, means that the number of body expressions must be fixed.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define ((choose . 1st) . 2nd)
> @list{Either you're @1st, or @|2nd|.})
> @(define who "me")
> @@choose{with @who}{against @who}
> | → |
> Either you're with me, or against me.

#### 1.3`` Using Printouts

Because the text language simply displays each toplevel value as the file is run, it is possible to print text directly as part of the output.

> #lang scribble/text
> First
> @display{Second}
> Third
> | → |
> First
> Second
> Third

Taking this further, it is possible to write functions that output some text instead of returning values that represent the text.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n)
> (for ([i (in-range 1 (+ n 1))])
> (printf "~a Mississippi,\n" i)))
> Start...
> @count[3]@; avoid an empty line
> ... and I'm done.
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi,
> ... and I'm done.

This can be used to produce a lot of output text, even infinite.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n)
> (printf "~a Mississippi,\n" n)
> (count (add1 n)))
> Start...
> @count[1]
> this line is never printed!
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi,
> 4 Mississippi,
> 5 Mississippi,
> ...

However, you should be careful not to mix returning values with printouts, as the results are rarely desirable.

> #lang scribble/text
> @list{1 @display{two} 3}
> | → |
> two1 3

Note that you don’t need side-effects if you want infinite output. The output function iterates thunks and (composable) promises, so you can create a loop that is delayed in either form.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (count n)
> (cons @list{@n Mississippi,@"\n"}
> (lambda ()
> (count (add1 n)))))
> Start...
> @count[1]
> this line is never printed!
> | → |
> Start...
> 1 Mississippi,
> 2 Mississippi,
> 3 Mississippi,
> 4 Mississippi,
> 5 Mississippi,
> ...

#### 1.4`` Indentation in Preprocessed output

An issue that can be very important in many text generation applications is the indentation of the output. This can be crucial in some cases, if you’re generating code for an indentation-sensitive language (e.g., Haskell, Python, or C preprocessor directives). To get a better understanding of how the pieces interact, you may want to review how the Scribble reader section, but also remember that you can use quoted forms to see how some form is read.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(format "~s" '@list{
> a
> b
> c})
> | → |
> (list "a" "\n" " " "b" "\n" "c")

The Scribble reader ignores indentation spaces in its body. This is an intentional feature, since you usually do not want an expression to depend on its position in the source. But the question is whether we can render some output text with proper indentation. The output function achieves that by introducing blocks. Just like a list, a block contains a list of elements, and when one is rendered, it is done in its own indentation level. When a newline is part of a block’s contents, it causes the following text to appear with indentation that corresponds to the column position at the beginning of the block.

In addition, lists are also rendered as blocks by default, so they can be used for the same purpose. In most cases, this makes the output appear “as intended” where lists are used for nested pieces of text — either from a literal list expression, or an expression that evaluates to a list, or when a list is passed on as a value; either as a toplevel expression, or as a nested value; either appearing after spaces, or after other output.

> #lang scribble/text
> foo @block{1
> 2
> 3}
> foo @list{4
> 5
> 6}
> | → |
> foo 1
> 2
> 3
> foo 4
> 5
> 6

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (code . text)
> @list{begin
> @text
> end})
> @code{first
> second
> @code{
> third
> fourth}
> last}
> | → |
> begin
> first
> second
> begin
> third
> fourth
> end
> last
> end

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (enumerate . items)
> (add-newlines #:sep ";\n"
> (for/list ([i (in-naturals 1)]
> [item (in-list items)])
> @list{@|i|. @item})))
> Todo: @enumerate[@list{Install Racket}
> @list{Hack, hack, hack}
> @list{Profit}].
> | → |
> Todo: 1. Install Racket;
> 2. Hack, hack, hack;
> 3. Profit.

There are, however, cases when you need more refined control over the output. The scribble/text language provides a few functions for such cases in addition to block. The splice function groups together a number of values but avoids introducing a new indentation context. Furthermore, lists are not always rendered as blocks — instead, they are rendered as splices when they are used inside one, so you essentially use splice to avoid the “indentation group” behavior, and block to restore it.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (blah . text)
> @splice{{
> blah(@block{@text});
> }})
> start
> @splice{foo();
> loop:}
> @list{if (something) @blah{one,
> two}}
> end
> | → |
> start
> foo();
> loop:
> if (something) {
> blah(one,
> two);
> }
> end

The disable-prefix function disables all indentation printouts in its contents, including the indentation before the body of the disable-prefix value itself. It is useful, for example, to print out CPP directives.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (((IFFOO . var) . expr1) . expr2)
> (define (array e1 e2)
> @list{[@e1,
> @e2]})
> @list{var @var;
> @disable-prefix{#ifdef FOO}
> @var = @array[expr1 expr2];
> @disable-prefix{#else}
> @var = @array[expr2 expr1];
> @disable-prefix{#endif}})
> function blah(something, something_else) {
> @disable-prefix{#include "stuff.inc"}
> @@@IFFOO{i}{something}{something_else}
> }
> | → |
> function blah(something, something_else) {
> #include "stuff.inc"
> var i;
> #ifdef FOO
> i = [something,
> something_else];
> #else
> i = [something_else,
> something];
> #endif
> }

If there are values after a disable-prefix value on the same line, they will get indented to the goal column (unless the output is already beyond it).

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (thunk name . body)
> @list{function @name() {
> @body
> }})
> @(define (ifdef cond then else)
> @list{@disable-prefix{#}ifdef @cond
> @then
> @disable-prefix{#}else
> @else
> @disable-prefix{#}endif})
> @thunk['do_stuff]{
> init();
> @ifdef["HAS_BLAH"
> @list{var x = blah();}
> @thunk['blah]{
> @ifdef["BLEHOS"
> @list{@disable-prefix{#}@;
> include <bleh.h>
> bleh();}
> @list{error("no bleh");}]
> }]
> more_stuff();
> }
> | → |
> function do_stuff() {
> init();
> # ifdef HAS_BLAH
> var x = blah();
> # else
> function blah() {
> # ifdef BLEHOS
> # include <bleh.h>
> bleh();
> # else
> error("no bleh");
> # endif
> }
> # endif
> more_stuff();
> }

There are cases where each line should be prefixed with some string other than a plain indentation. The add-prefix function causes its contents to be printed using some given string prefix for every line. The prefix gets accumulated to an existing indentation, and indentation in the contents gets added to the prefix.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (comment . body)
> @add-prefix["// "]{@body})
> @comment{add : int int -> string}
> char *foo(int x, int y) {
> @comment{
> skeleton:
> allocate a string
> print the expression into it
> @comment{...more work...}
> }
> char *buf = malloc(@comment{FIXME!
> This is bad}
> 100);
> }
> | → |
> // add : int int -> string
> char *foo(int x, int y) {
> // skeleton:
> // allocate a string
> // print the expression into it
> // // ...more work...
> char *buf = malloc(// FIXME!
> // This is bad
> 100);
> }

When combining add-prefix and disable-prefix there is an additional value that can be useful: flush. This is a value that causes output to print the current indentation and prefix. This makes it possible to get the “ignored as a prefix” property of disable-prefix but only for a nested prefix.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(define (comment . text)
> (list flush
> @add-prefix[" *"]{
> @disable-prefix{/*} @text */}))
> function foo(x) {
> @comment{blah
> more blah
> yet more blah}
> if (x < 0) {
> @comment{even more
> blah here
> @comment{even
> nested}}
> do_stuff();
> }
> }
> | → |
> function foo(x) {
> /* blah
> * more blah
> * yet more blah */
> if (x < 0) {
> /* even more
> * blah here
> * /* even
> * * nested */ */
> do_stuff();
> }
> }

#### 1.5`` Using External Files

Using additional files that contain code for your preprocessing is trivial: the source text is still source code in a module, so you can require additional files with utility functions.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(require "itemize.rkt")
> Todo:
> @itemize[@list{Hack some}
> @list{Sleep some}
> @list{Hack some
> more}]
> > > "itemize.rkt"
> > > #lang racket
> > > (provide itemize)
> > > (define (itemize . items)
> > > (add-between (map (lambda (item)
> > > (list "* " item))
> > > items)
> > > "\n"))
> | → |
> Todo:
> * Hack some
> * Sleep some
> * Hack some
> more

Note that the at-exp language can often be useful here, since such files need to deal with texts. Using it, it is easy to include a lot of textual content.

> #lang scribble/text
> @(require "stuff.rkt")
> Todo:
> @itemize[@list{Hack some}
> @list{Sleep some}
> @list{Hack some
> more}]
> @summary
> > > "stuff.rkt"
> > > #lang at-exp racket/base
> > > (require racket/list)
> > > (provide (all-defined-out))
> > > (define (itemize . items)
> > > (add-between (map (lambda (item)
> > > @list{* @item})
> > > items)
> > > "\n"))
> > > (define summary
> > > @list{If that's not enough,
> > > I don't know what is.})
> | → |
> Todo:
> * Hack some
> * Sleep some
> * Hack some
> more
> If that's not enough,
> I don't know what is.

Of course, the extreme side of this will be to put all of your content in a plain Racket module, using @-formss for convenience. However, there is no need to use the text language in this case; instead, you can (require scribble/text), which will get all of the bindings that are available in the scribble/text language. Using output, switching from a preprocessed files to a Racket file is very easy —- choosing one or the other depends on whether it is more convenient to write a text file with occasional Racket expressions or the other way.

> #lang at-exp racket/base
> (require scribble/text racket/list)
> (define (itemize . items)
> (add-between (map (lambda (item)
> @list{* @item})
> items)
> "\n"))
> (define summary
> @list{If that's not enough,
> I don't know what is.})
> (output
> @list{
> Todo:
> @itemize[@list{Hack some}
> @list{Sleep some}
> @list{Hack some
> more}]
> @summary
> })
> | → |
> Todo:
> * Hack some
> * Sleep some
> * Hack some
> more
> If that's not enough,
> I don't know what is.

However, you might run into a case where it is desirable to include a mostly-text file from a scribble/text source file. It might be because you prefer to split the source text to several files, or because you need to use a template file that cannot have a #lang header (for example, an HTML template file that is the result of an external editor). In these cases, the scribble/text language provides an include form that includes a file in the preprocessor syntax (where the default parsing mode is text).

> #lang scribble/text
> @(require racket/list)
> @(define (itemize . items)
> (list
> "<ul>"
> (add-between
> (map (lambda (item)
> @list{<li>@|item|</li>})
> items)
> "\n")
> "</ul>"))
> @(define title "Todo")
> @(define summary
> @list{If that's not enough,
> I don't know what is.})
> @include["template.html"]
> > > "template.html"
> > > <html>
> > > <head><title>@|title|</title></head>
> > > <body>
> > > <h1>@|title|</h1>
> > > @itemize[@list{Hack some}
> > > @list{Sleep some}
> > > @list{Hack some
> > > more}]
> > > <p><i>@|summary|</i></p>
> > > </body>
> > > </html>
> | → |
> <html>
> <head><title>Todo</title></head>
> <body>
> <h1>Todo</h1>
> <ul><li>Hack some</li>
> <li>Sleep some</li>
> <li>Hack some
> more</li></ul>
> <p><i>If that's not enough,
> I don't know what is.</i></p>
> </body>
> </html>

(Using require with a text file in the scribble/text language will not work as intended: the language will display the text is when the module is invoked, so the required file’s contents will be printed before any of the requiring module’s text does. If you find yourself in such a situation, it is better to switch to a Racket-with-@-expressions file as shown above.)

#### 1.6`` Text Generation Functions

> value outputable/c : contract?

A contract that (in principle) corresponds to value that can be output by output. Currently, however, this contract accepts all values (to avoid the cost of checking at every boundary).

Added in version 1.1 of package scribble-text-lib.

> procedure (output v [port]) → void?
> v : outputable/c
> port : output-port? = (current-output-port)

Outputs values to port as follows for each kind of v:

- strings, byte strings, symbols, paths, keywords, numbers, and characters: converts the value to a string along the same lines as display, and then passes the string to the current writer, which is initially write-string

- #<void>, #f, or null: no output

- list: output depends on the current mode, which is initially splice mode:

  - block mode: each item in order, using the starting column as the current indentation (which starts out empty)

  - splice mode: outputs each item in order

- (block v2 ...): outputs each v2 in block mode.

- (splice v2 ...): outputs each v2 in splice mode.

- (set-prefix pfx v2 ...): sets the current prefix, which is initially empty, to pfx while outputting each v2.

- (add-prefix pfx v2 ...): sets the current prefix to by adding pfx while outputting each v2.

- (disable-prefix v2 ...): sets the current prefix to empty while outputting each v2.

- (restore-prefix v2 ...): rewinds the current prefix by one enclosing adjustments while outputting each v2.

- flush: outputs the current indentation and current prefix.

- (with-writer writer v2 ...): sets the current writer to writer with outputting each v2.

- promise: outputs the result of (force v)

- box: outputs the result of (unbox v)

- procedure of 0 arguments: outputs the result of (v)

Any other kind of v triggers an exception.

> procedure (block v ...) → outputable/c
> v : outputable/c

Produces a value that outputs each v in block mode.

> procedure (splice v ...) → outputable/c
> v : outputable/c

Produces a value that outputs each v in splice mode.

> procedure (disable-prefix v ...) → outputable/c
> v : outputable/c
> procedure (restore-prefix v ...) → outputable/c
> v : outputable/c
> procedure (add-prefix pfx v ...) → outputable/c
> pfx : (or/c string? exact-nonnegative-integer?)
> v : outputable/c
> procedure (set-prefix pfx v ...) → outputable/c
> pfx : (or/c string? exact-nonnegative-integer?)
> v : outputable/c

Produces a value that outputs with an adjusted current prefix. An integer as a prefix is equivalent to a string with as many space characters.

> value flush : void?

A value that outputs as the current indentation plus current prefix.

> procedure (with-writer writer v ...) → outputable/c
> | writer |  | : |  |
> (or/c (->* (string? output-port?)
> (exact-nonnegative-integer?)
> any/c)
> #f)
> v : outputable/c

Produces a value that outputs with an adjusted current writer, where #f indicates write-string.

> procedure (add-newlines items [#:sep sep]) → list?
> items : list?
> sep : an/y = "\n"

Like add-between, but first removes #f and #<void> elements of items.

> procedure (split-lines items) → (listof list?)
> items : list?

Converts items to a list of lists, where consecutive non-"\n" values are kept together in a nested list, and "\n" values are dropped.

> syntax (include/text maybe-char path-spec)
> maybe-char |  | = |  |
> |  | | |  | #:command-char command-char

Like include from racket/include, but reads the file at path-spec in the same way as for scribble/text. If command-char is supplied, then it replaces @ as the escape character.

The scribble/text language via #lang provides include/text as include.

> syntax (begin/text form ...)

Like begin, but the results of expression forms are collected into a list that is returned as the result of the begin/list form.

The scribble/text language via #lang provides begin/text as begin.

top ← prev up next →